“It’s Halftime in America” — An Analysis

Every year, the commercials during the Superbowl are anticipated with almost as much enthusiasm as the game itself. This year was no exception.

One commercial that caught my attention was Chrysler’s motivational offering entitled “It’s Halftime America” and featuring Clint Eastwood. The ad has not been without controversy. However, I want to leave aside all commentary about politics and economics and bailouts, and analyze the speech on its own merits. I found it excellent for many reasons and believe that it contains valuable lessons for anyone who has to give a motivational speech.

First, you should watch the commercial below. Or rather, you should listen to it. This commercial has been meticulously scripted and contains beautiful images. Most speakers do not have a professional film and sound crew to produce a studio-quality film. (Nor do most of us guys have the cool, raspy voice of Clint Eastwood.)

So by all means, watch the video. But then replay it and listen to it while reading the transcript which I have added immediately below. The analysis follows.

It’s halftime.

Both teams are in their locker room discussing what they can do to win this game in the second half.

It’s halftime in America too.

People are out of work and they’re hurting and they’re all wondering what they’re going to do to make a comeback and we’re all scared because this isn’t a game.

The people of Detroit know a little something about this.

They almost lost everything.

But we all pulled together. Now Motor City is fighting again.

I’ve seen a lot of tough eras, a lot of downturns in my life, times when we didn’t understand each other.

It seems that we’ve lost our heart at times.

The fog of division, discord and blame made it hard to see what lies ahead.

But after those trials we all rallied around what was right and acted as one.

Because that’s what we do. We find a way through tough times and if we can’t find a way, then we’ll make one.

All that matters now is what’s ahead. How do we come from behind? How do we come together? And how do we win?

Detroit’s showing us it can be done. And what’s true about them is true about all of us.

This country can’t be knocked out with one punch. We get right back up again and when we do the world’s going to hear the roar of our engines.

Yeah, it’s halftime America and our second half is about to begin.

———

So what was good about Clint Eastwood’s speech and what can we learn from it?

1. A speech does not have to be long to be effective. In a previous post in which I analyzed the Gettysburg Address, I noted that Lincoln’s speech was only 272 words. Eastwood’s is on par with that, coming in at 247 words. I’m not suggesting that Clint Eastwood’s speech is on the same level as Abraham Lincoln’s; however, I am saying that a few well chosen words can have a much greater impact that many poorly chosen words.

2. Rhetorical devices are just as important today as they were centuries ago. Eastwood incorporates a number of rhetorical devices in his speech.

(a) Metaphor: “It’s half time in America”; “The fog of division, discord and blame”; “This country can’t be knocked out with one punch”.

(b) Polysyndeton: “People are out of work and they’re hurting and they’re all wondering what they’re going to do to make a comeback and we’re all scared because this isn’t a game.”

(c) Asyndeton: “I’ve seen a lot of tough eras, a lot of downturns in my life, times when we didn’t understand each other.”

(d) Anaphora: “How do we come from behind? How do we come together? And how do we win?

3. Repetition of key words or ideas is a powerful speaking technique. Note the following words that Eastwood repeated: “we” (14 times); “our” (3 times); “halftime” or “half” (5 times); “America” or “country” (3 times); “Detroit” or “Motor City” (3 times).

4. Pausing is one of the most important things that a speaker can do. Pausing allows the audience time to absorb the full force of your words. I counted a dozen or so extended pauses in Eastwood’s short speech.

5. The right words in the right order add rhythm to a speech. Listen again to the sentence that begins, “The fog of division, discord and blame …”. The order of the three words was not random. Going from three syllables to two to one gives the phrase a rhythm that you do not get with any other ordering of those words. Look for opportunities to create rhythm in your speeches.

6. Contrast is important. As Nancy Duarte says in her book, Resonate:

“People are naturally attracted to opposites, so presentations should draw from this attraction to create interest. Communicating an idea juxtaposed with its polar opposite creates energy. Moving back and forth between the contradictory poles encourages full engagement from the audience.” 

Eastwood’s speech is filled with contrasts: the first half vs. the second half; the past vs. the future; Detroit almost losing everything vs. Detroit fighting again; being lost in the fog of discord vs. rallying around what’s right; being knocked down vs. getting back up.

7. A call to action is a powerful way to end a speech. “Our second half is about to begin” is a great ending. It is both subtle and powerful. It reminded me of Al Pacino’s “Now, what are you gonna do?” in his speech in the film On Any Given Sunday.

I have two suggestions. The first is grammatical; the second relates to word choice.

(1) “The fog of division, discord and blame made it hard to see what lies ahead. But after those trials we all rallied around what was right and acted as one.”

Because the fog of division, etc. occurred in the past and because the trials were overcome in the past, the correct tense of the verb “to lie” should also be in the past. Thus, “The fog of division, discord and blame made it hard to see what lay ahead.”

(2) “Detroit’s showing us it can be done. And what’s true about them is true about all of usThis country can’t be knocked out with one punch.”

I don’t like the way in which Detroit and the United States are portrayed as them and us. Obviously, this was not the intention. Still, it would have been more effective, in my view, to substitute “Detroit” and “America” for “them” and “all of us”. Thus, “Detroit’s showing us it can be done. And what’s true about Detroit is true about America. This country can’t be knocked out with one punch.”

The repetition of “Detroit” adds rhythm. The use of “America” feeds nicely into “This country”, which begins the following sentence. Most importantly, the idea that Detroit is a part of America, that Detroit is on the same team as America, is reinforced.

Still, on the whole, I think that Chrysler and Clint Eastwood have given us a solid example of how to construct a motivational speech.

Advertisements

About John Zimmer

International speaker, presentation skills expert, lawyer, improv performer
This entry was posted in Analysis of a Speech and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to “It’s Halftime in America” — An Analysis

  1. Lauren Sleigh says:

    The ad was absolutely scripted for Eastwood. It was written by the author Smith Henderson, whose novel Fourth of July Creek was a bestseller last year. He was working freelance at the responsible ad agency at the time, and came up with both the concept and the wording. All credit should go to him.

    Like

  2. Kamran says:

    Good analysis, but the key word here as you said is, “scripted”. You attributed a little too much to Eastwood here. Any Rhetorical devices he used were written so for him by the speech writer. He is by far one of the worst speakers of all time (any one remember the last republican convention?!). He could not put a speech together himself if his life depended on it! And the man admits this himself! The only thing they used Eastwood for here was his tough-guy image form the past, his voice and his ability to read a script like he does in any movie – that’s it! Other than that, given the same script you could have perhaps done just about the same job as Clint Eastwood did!

    Like

    • John Zimmer says:

      Thanks, Kamran. I think you’re being too hard on old Clint. There is no question that the way in which the dialogue with the chair played out was a disaster from a public speaking perspective. But there were still good things to take out of the speech, as noted in the post. There is no question that the Republicans brought him out because of his tough-guy image but I don’t think his talk was scripted.

      Cheers!

      John

      Like

      • Kamran says:

        Thanks John, if you read my post carefully, here is what I wrote: the “Chrysler ad” was fully scripted for Clint and he read it off like a good actor — but it was not his speech. However, his rambling at the Republican national convention was his “speech” and therefore it was a disaster by all accounts. Here is what the media had to say: “MSNBC pundits said Clint Eastwood’s GOP convention speech Thursday night was a “bizarre” and “embarrassing” “disaster,” and a Fox News reporter wouldn’t even touch it.” Here is what Clint Eastwood himself said about his own speech: “I figure if somebody’s dumb enough to ask me to go to a political convention and say something, they’re gonna have to take what they get”.
        To summerize: as Toastmasters we try never to do what Clint Eastwood did. That is, we don’t read someone else’s speech, we write our own (Chrysler ad) and if we are invited to give a speech at a convention, we go prepared — even if out of respect for the organizers and the audience. Well, Eastwood did none of that. But then again John, given the context I just described, if you still see any good pointers in Clint Eastwood as a speaker please share them!

        Like

        • John Zimmer says:

          Kamran, thanks for the follow-up comment. I owe you an apology. The comments on the blog come to me on a separate page. When I saw your comment about Clint Eastwood, I mistakenly though that you had left it on my post about his convention speech. I realize now that your comment was on the “Halftime in America” post. Even though you did not, in fact, mention the “Chrysler ad” by name in your original comment, I still should have picked up on it.

          As to the substance of your comment on “Halftime in America”, I have no doubt that the ad was fully scripted for Eastwood. It still makes for a good speech and there is a lot that we can learn from it. For me, it is the same thing as great speeches from movies, a few of which I have analyzed on the blog. They were all scripted for the actors, but they are still good speeches that were well delivered. And we can learn from them.

          I agree with you on the importance of being prepared, something that I have written about at length in several posts. And yes, most people usually write their own speeches. But it is possible to deliver a speech written by someone else in a professional and persuasive manner. Someone like Barack Obama does not have the luxury of being able to write every speech that he delivers; yet he almost always does an excellent job when delivering a prepared speech.

          John

          Like

  3. Mike Murphy says:

    I must go back and listen, rather than just watch, this speech; I had not realised there were only 247 words. I will look at your other posts.

    I am making a six minute speech at a speakers club tomorrow. Your post reminded me to pause to help my audience. Easy to say but I will put it in my notes to do so.

    Thanks.

    Like

    • John Zimmer says:

      Thanks for the comment, Mike. If you use notes, there is nothing wrong with writing “PAUSE” in big letters at the top of the page to remind you. The notes are for you alone. Best of luck with the speech!

      John

      Like

  4. Leon says:

    I’m not American, but saw the Superbowl (my first ever Football Match) at a friend’s house in Asia. But this ad was much more interesting than the game itself! Great analysis, thanks.

    Like

    • John Zimmer says:

      Hi Leon. Thanks for the comment. Football (North American) is far more popular in the U.S. and Canada (where I am from) than anywhere else, although interest in it has been growing. I enjoy the game, even if I much prefer hockey. Glad you enjoyed the analysis.

      John

      Like

  5. John, an excellent analysis of the Chrysler ad. Your point about “us” and “them” is dead-on. I also appreciate the insight into the techniques used. Asyndeton is a bit difficult but it’s very effective when done right.

    Thanks!

    Like

  6. Pingback: Daily Pundit » Legal Eagles | Best Law Practice Info

  7. Pingback: Break it down | simpson speaks

Join the conversation. We'd like to have your opinion.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s